TY - JOUR
T1 - Straylight values after refractive surgery
T2 - screening for ocular fitness in demanding professions
AU - van Bree, Maartje C J
AU - van Verre, Hedwig P
AU - Devreese, Marina T
AU - Larminier, Frans
AU - van den Berg, Thomas J T P
N1 - Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - PURPOSE: To study straylight testing as a screening method for ocular fitness after refractive surgery in demanding professions and to determine the distribution of elevations in straylight as a result of refractive surgery in a non-research setting in contrast with earlier reports in research settings.DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: The refractive surgery population consisted of 373 eyes in 198 subjects with a history of refractive surgery. The reference population consisted of 402 eyes in 214 young individuals without a history of refractive surgery.METHODS: Data were collected as part of routine testing at The Queen Astrid Military Hospital (Belgium), an independent military institution responsible for medical fitness examinations. Intraocular straylight was measured with the commercially available C-Quant instrument (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), using the psychophysical compensation comparison (CC) method. Fellow eyes were compared to evaluate methodological aspects. The prevalence of impairment was evaluated for 2 age-independent cutoff criteria, a 2.0-fold and 3.2-fold increase, and an age-dependent cutoff criterion corresponding to an increase of 0.20 log units.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Methodological aspects such as repeatability, systematic differences, and distance to impaired scores, and prevalence of impaired straylight values after refractive surgery using proposed cutoff criteria.RESULTS: The CC method exhibited good repeatability, and the chance of impaired scores due to variability in measurement was small. The prevalence of impaired straylight values was minimal in the reference population. In the refractive population, 9% (33/373) of values were above the factor 2.0 criterion, 2% (7/373) were above the factor 3.2 criterion, and 12% (45/373) were 0.20 log units above the age reference.CONCLUSIONS: Straylight testing is a viable screening method for ocular fitness after refractive surgery. Patients from the general population who have undergone refractive surgery have significant elevations more frequently than surgery populations from high-quality research centers.
AB - PURPOSE: To study straylight testing as a screening method for ocular fitness after refractive surgery in demanding professions and to determine the distribution of elevations in straylight as a result of refractive surgery in a non-research setting in contrast with earlier reports in research settings.DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: The refractive surgery population consisted of 373 eyes in 198 subjects with a history of refractive surgery. The reference population consisted of 402 eyes in 214 young individuals without a history of refractive surgery.METHODS: Data were collected as part of routine testing at The Queen Astrid Military Hospital (Belgium), an independent military institution responsible for medical fitness examinations. Intraocular straylight was measured with the commercially available C-Quant instrument (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), using the psychophysical compensation comparison (CC) method. Fellow eyes were compared to evaluate methodological aspects. The prevalence of impairment was evaluated for 2 age-independent cutoff criteria, a 2.0-fold and 3.2-fold increase, and an age-dependent cutoff criterion corresponding to an increase of 0.20 log units.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Methodological aspects such as repeatability, systematic differences, and distance to impaired scores, and prevalence of impaired straylight values after refractive surgery using proposed cutoff criteria.RESULTS: The CC method exhibited good repeatability, and the chance of impaired scores due to variability in measurement was small. The prevalence of impaired straylight values was minimal in the reference population. In the refractive population, 9% (33/373) of values were above the factor 2.0 criterion, 2% (7/373) were above the factor 3.2 criterion, and 12% (45/373) were 0.20 log units above the age reference.CONCLUSIONS: Straylight testing is a viable screening method for ocular fitness after refractive surgery. Patients from the general population who have undergone refractive surgery have significant elevations more frequently than surgery populations from high-quality research centers.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
KW - Glare
KW - Humans
KW - Light
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Military Medicine
KW - Military Personnel
KW - Occupations
KW - Physical Fitness
KW - Refractive Surgical Procedures
KW - Scattering, Radiation
KW - Task Performance and Analysis
KW - Visual Acuity/physiology
KW - Visual Perception
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 21236491
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 118
SP - 945
EP - 953
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 5
ER -