The conclusions of Clemson et al concerning valproic acid are premature

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	153; author reply 153-4
Journal	British Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume	95
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.194373
Publication status	Published - Jan 2011

Keywords

@article{6c18ce57e49746f6b4ded0906bf282d1,

title = "The conclusions of Clemson et al concerning valproic acid are premature",

keywords = "Humans, Retinitis Pigmentosa/drug therapy, Valproic Acid/therapeutic use, Visual Acuity/physiology",

author = "{van Schooneveld}, {Mary J} and {van den Born}, {L Ingeborgh} and {van Genderen}, Mies and Jan-Geert Bollemeijer",

year = "2011",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1136/bjo.2010.194373",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "153; author reply 153--4",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conclusions of Clemson et al concerning valproic acid are premature

AU - van Schooneveld, Mary J

AU - van den Born, L Ingeborgh

AU - van Genderen, Mies

AU - Bollemeijer, Jan-Geert

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

KW - Humans

KW - Retinitis Pigmentosa/drug therapy

KW - Valproic Acid/therapeutic use

KW - Visual Acuity/physiology

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2010.194373

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2010.194373

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 20971790

SN - 0007-1161

VL - 95

SP - 153; author reply 153-4

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

IS - 1

ER -