Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak; Grzegorz Labuz; Ivanka J van der Meulen; Jan Willem van der Linden; M P Mourits; Tom J van den Berg

doi:10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak, Grzegorz Labuz, Ivanka J van der Meulen, Jan Willem van der Linden, M P Mourits, Tom J van den Berg

Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).

METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.

RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	746-51
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Refractive Surgery
Volume	31
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03
Publication status	Published - Nov 2015

Keywords

Aged
Disability Evaluation
Female
Glare
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Lenses, Intraocular
Light
Male
Middle Aged
Phacoemulsification
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Pseudophakia/physiopathology
Scattering, Radiation
Vision Disorders/diagnosis
Visual Acuity/physiology

Access to Document

10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

Cite this

@article{5d8d96233cbf4af0b15ae8df64d14de4,

title = "Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses",

abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikger{\"a}te, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference.",

keywords = "Aged, Disability Evaluation, Female, Glare, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Phacoemulsification, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Pseudophakia/physiopathology, Scattering, Radiation, Vision Disorders/diagnosis, Visual Acuity/physiology",

author = "Ruth Lapid-Gortzak and Grzegorz Labuz and {van der Meulen}, {Ivanka J} and {van der Linden}, {Jan Willem} and Mourits, {M P} and {van den Berg}, {Tom J}",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

doi = "10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "746--51",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

AU - Lapid-Gortzak, Ruth

AU - Labuz, Grzegorz

AU - van der Meulen, Ivanka J

AU - van der Linden, Jan Willem

AU - Mourits, M P

AU - van den Berg, Tom J

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference.

KW - Aged

KW - Disability Evaluation

KW - Female

KW - Glare

KW - Humans

KW - Lens Implantation, Intraocular

KW - Lenses, Intraocular

KW - Light

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Phacoemulsification

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Pseudophakia/physiopathology

KW - Scattering, Radiation

KW - Vision Disorders/diagnosis

KW - Visual Acuity/physiology

U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

M3 - Article

C2 - 26544562

SN - 1081-597X

VL - 31

SP - 746

EP - 751

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

IS - 11

ER -

Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this