Abstract
BACKGROUND: HLA-A/-B matching on a split typing level is more laborious, more expensive and offers less chances for a well-fitting match than does matching on the conventional broad typing level. It is important, therefore, to investigate whether or not split matching offers advantages and would, therefore, be advisable.
METHODS: 303 high-risk patients out of 2,471 keratoplasty patients from 1982 through 1996, whose histories were all followed prospectively, could be re-evaluated retrospectively according to their broad or split matching levels ('good' vs. 'moderate').
RESULTS: Only a 'good' split level matching was significantly better than a 'moderate' one in the long run (up to 12 years). For the broad level matching this was only true for the first few years after keratoplasty.
CONCLUSION: If only HLA-A/-B are matched and if only results longer than 3-4 years (up to 12 years) are taken into consideration, then split level matching offers clear-cut advantages over broad level matching.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Developments in Ophthalmology |
Subtitle of host publication | Adequate HLA Matching in Keratoplasty |
Editors | R Sundmacher |
Pages | 12-21 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Volume | 36 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-318-00905-7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Publication series
Name | Developments in Ophthalmology |
---|---|
Publisher | S Karger AG |
ISSN (Print) | 0250-3751 |
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Child
- Cornea/immunology
- Female
- Graft Survival/physiology
- HLA-A Antigens/immunology
- HLA-B Antigens/immunology
- Histocompatibility/physiology
- Histocompatibility Testing
- Humans
- Keratoplasty, Penetrating/immunology
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- Tissue Donors