Accuracy of matching optic discs with visual fields: the European Structure and Function Assessment Trial (ESAFAT)

Josine van der Schoot, Nicolaas J Reus, David F Garway-Heath, Ville Saarela, Alfonso Anton, Alain M Bron, Christoph Faschinger, Gábor Holló, Michele Iester, Jost B Jonas, Fotis Topouzis, Thierry G Zeyen, Hans G Lemij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the ability of ophthalmologists across Europe to match stereoscopic optic disc photographs to visual fields of varying severity.

DESIGN: Evaluation and comparison of 2 diagnostic tests.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 109 of 260 invited ophthalmologists in 11 European countries. These had participated in the previous European Optic Disc Assessment Trial (EODAT), a trial on glaucoma diagnostic accuracy based on optic discs only.

METHODS: Each participant matched stereo optic disc photographs of 40 healthy and 48 glaucomatous eyes to a visual field chosen from 4 options per disc. The 4 presented visual fields included the corresponding one and 3 other visual fields, varying in severity. The matching accuracy and any inaccuracy per disease severity were calculated. Classification accuracy (as glaucomatous or healthy) was compared with EODAT data. Duplicate slides allowed for the assessment of intraobserver agreement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of matching optic discs with their corresponding visual field and of classifying them as healthy or glaucomatous; intraobserver agreement (κ).

RESULTS: The overall accuracy of ophthalmologists for correctly matching stereoscopic optic disc photographs to their visual fields was 58.7%. When incorrectly matched, the observers generally overestimated the visual field severity (P<0.001), notably in eyes with early glaucoma. The intraobserver agreement was, on average, moderate (0.52).

CONCLUSIONS: European ophthalmologists correctly matched stereoscopic optic disc photographs to their corresponding visual field in only approximately 59% of cases. In most mismatches, the clinicians overestimated the visual field damage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2470-2475
Number of pages6
JournalOphthalmology
Volume120
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • European Continental Ancestry Group
  • Female
  • Glaucoma/diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Ocular Hypertension/diagnosis
  • Ophthalmology/standards
  • Ophthalmoscopy
  • Optic Disk/pathology
  • Optic Nerve Diseases/diagnosis
  • Photography
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Vision Disorders/physiopathology
  • Visual Field Tests
  • Visual Fields/physiology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of matching optic discs with visual fields: the European Structure and Function Assessment Trial (ESAFAT)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this